Thus … the conscience of in-itself is destruction … and all conscience is conscience of some thing. (LUIJPEN, 1973 p.77) When I observe something I know of in the distance that it exists between what I am and what I observe. I am not identical what I observe (not identity). But, when verwhelming an object, I perceive that in the truth affirm I it, that is, volume conscience of that it exists and that I am not as it.
In the existencial fenomenologia of Sartre we look at pra it are, we observe the other and thus we are only capable to come back our interioridade and to know we ourselves. He is the other that identifies to me it judges that me. When I reveal for the other, to make me to it to be, exactly also taking off of me my subjectivity. This philosopher shows despite nor always this contact with the exterior is positive, after all according to he himself the hell is the others. Identifying … two possible levels he stops with another one: first, the love, the language, the masochism. In second tier, the indifference, the desire, the hatred, the sadism. (GALLO, 2008 p.4) the love is placed as one ' ' sim' ' to the other, one I appeal to be together.
Already the hatred in Sartre … the look is a hatred look, the look that not accepted me as subject, does not tolerate that I eat subjectivity projects my proper world, but it launches yes me as a thing of the world, signing my possibilities. (LUIJPEN, 1973 p.289) 3. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ' ' THE OUTRO' ' ' ' THE COBRADOR' ' OF RUBEM FONSECA the stories of Rubem Fonseca are considered in its majority, representation of the literary freedom of the author, capable to touch in subjects before not treat or writings to shy form.
Comments Off on Rubem Fonseca