Reinessance Man Collective - Profiles of Today's Polygnaths

Disputes about the location of allocated land are allowed participants shared ownership with the use of conciliation, the procedure which is established by each subject of Federation itself. In the case of no agreed solution to the dispute about the location of allocated land are considered in court. General meeting of participants in share ownership by the federal law are not entitled to resolve disputes participants in share ownership through conciliation. Thus, based on a literal interpretation of the Federal Law "On Land Turnover Agricultural and opinions of experts in the field of land law, we have given detailed answers to questions in the beginning of this article. And now, I think readers will be interested to know the official position of the Constitutional Court on the same issues. According to the Constitutional Court, the right party to share ownership of the land from agricultural land to release land area on account of its land share is not absolute, since its implementation is due to some legislator demands the conservation purpose of such land and the existence of co-owners of common interests as expressed by the majority. In order to prevent inappropriate from the standpoint of the majority, the allocation of specific plots of land, which could unnecessarily reduce the cost of land remaining in the common property, or be difficult to use for their intended purpose, the federal legislator has provided the general meeting of co-owners right claim boundaries (location) of being in common ownership of land, intended to highlight a priority of land on account of land shares, and shared party property, who wishes to allocate his land share in kind - to determine the location of these boundaries allotted land.